Source: Hansard

[This post contains video, click to play]

Mr CRAIG KELLY (Hughes) (10:24): I move:

That this bill be now read a second time.

Firstly, I’d like to thank Carston, the truck driver who drove me to Parliament House this morning. God bless the truck drivers of Australia. I dedicate this bill to them.

Fifty-eight years ago, when I was born, I won one of the greatest lotteries in life because I was born in the free and democratic nation of Australia. I was bestowed, as my birthright, as an Australian, freedoms and liberties that have only ever been enjoyed by a small percentage of people throughout human history. Those freedoms that were my birthright did not come for free. They were fought for and won in places with names such as Beersheba, Fromelles, Pozieres, Bullecourt, the Coral Sea, Tobruk, Kapyong, Long Tan and thousands of others.

As politicians, we are reminded every single day when we come to this place. We look out the main entrance and we see in perfect alignment across Old Parliament House, across Lake Burley Griffin, up Anzac Parade and to the War Memorial. It’s a reminder that the freedoms and liberties that we enjoy have been won by the sacrifices of over 100,000 Australians who have given their lives in war to protect and safeguard those freedoms.

One of the great things about our nation is that we have extended those freedoms to others that have come across the seas. So when someone is a new migrant and decides to take an oath of citizenship and declare their allegiance to our country, they obtain the same birthrights that I have as an Australian—the same freedoms and liberties. As a nation, we work hard to bring those same freedoms and liberties that are the birthrights of every single Australian to others around the world. We participate in and we sign and commit to international treaties such as the Universal Declaration of Bioethics and Human Rights.

Article 6.1 of this treaty, to which Australia is a signatory, provides:

Any preventive, diagnostic and therapeutic medical intervention is only to be carried out with the prior, free and informed consent of the person concerned, based on adequate information. The consent should, where appropriate, be express and may be withdrawn by the person concerned at any time and for any reason without disadvantage or prejudice.

That is what we as a nation have signed up to in an international treaty, yet we find here in 2021 that the freedoms and the birthrights of Australians have been stolen—stolen mostly by unelected bureaucrats and cowardly politicians that are violating human rights and that are violating the principles of the Universal Declaration of Bioethics and Human Rights.

Let’s be absolutely clear about this: New South Wales Premier Berejiklian and health minister Hazzard, with New South Wales parliament suspended, are engaging in conduct which is a violation and abuse of human rights.

The coercion and the bullying of Australians to undergo any type of medical intervention is a violation of human rights in a violation of the principles of Australia’s international human rights obligations. Domestic passports are a violation of human rights, and yet we stand here in this parliament today with medical apartheid being enforced across the nation.

‘Submit or you will never get your freedoms back. You will be excluded from society, denied the freedom to travel, denied access to our beaches, denied access to our national parks.’ This should outrage every single one of us. ‘Also, you’ll be prevented from opening your business. We will deny you the freedom to earn a living. You will lose your job. You will lose your family home, unless you submit to taking a medical intervention.’ This is something that we have fought against. This is something against the Anzac spirit. What is wrong with you people? And this is from a party in New South Wales that on their website boasts that they supposedly believe ‘in the inalienable rights and freedoms of all people’? What a fraud!

This statement is a fraud upon the electorate of Australia, a betrayal of Liberal Party values and a betrayal of everything it means to be an Australian.

Shame on you, Berejiklian. Shame on you, Hazzard. Shame on you, Palaszczuk, Shame on you, Andrews. Shame on the lot of you.

When you use threats of inflicting disadvantage or inflicting prejudice on Australians because they don’t submit to your demands for medical intervention, you are engaging in abuses of human rights. History will condemn you for eternity as violators of human rights. Shame on every member of this House that cowardly hides under their desk and refuses to speak up to defend the freedoms and liberties of Australians.

Some may argue it’s okay to abuse human rights in these circumstances. That appears to be the formal position of the Liberal Party, the Labor Party, the Nationals and the Greens. Firstly, this position relies on the Doherty modelling; however, this modelling is fundamentally flawed. It uses assumptions that are both out of date and erroneous. Just look at the data out of Israel, and it will show you that the Doherty modelling’s assumptions are dodgy at the best. Remember, we’re not just talking about any old medical intervention; we are talking about a medical intervention that has zero long-term safety data. If you don’t believe me, I will quote directly from the TGA’s recent report, dated July 2021. I go to page 30 of 37. It talks about Pfizer’s application, and it says:

… the submitted data have the following limitations: The long-term efficacy and safety is not known.

But it’s even worse than that. It goes on. They admit here:

The VE—

which is the vaccine efficacy—

against variants of concern—

which of course would be delta—

has not been assessed.

These are the TGA’s own documents. This means it hasn’t been assessed against delta, and we have no idea what the long-term safety data is. And yet we are mandating this upon millions of Australians and forcing them with the threat that they will lose their jobs, they’ll be unable to put food on the table for their family and they won’t be able to pay their mortgage. What is wrong with you people? Seriously! It even gets worse.

Therefore, the purpose of this bill is to incorporate the Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights into Australian law, to hold those that violate and abuse human rights to account, and to bring them to justice. I commend this bill to the House, and I call on the government to urgently bring it up for debate and for a vote and let history record where every member of this parliament sits on this issue.

The SPEAKER: Is the motion seconded?

Mr Christensen: The motion is seconded.

Worse Than the Disease? Reviewing Some Possible Unintended Consequences of the mRNA Vaccines Against COVID-19

Powerful Sydney Freedom Day PROTEST VIDEO

Data from Israel shows very high number of COVID-19 cases in double jabbed. Vaccines not stopping transmission.

Independent Lab Tests Reveal At Least 62% of mRNA Vaccine Recipients Are Experiencing Capillary Clotting: Canada

The post CRAIG KELLY – Bill to Parliament: No Requirement for Medical Treatment (Including Experimental Injections) Without Consent appeared first on The Truth About Covid Vaccines.

Dear members,   

You may have read in the media overnight about Clive Palmer’s letter to both the Western Australian Premier and Chief Health Officer.   

The letter, which you can read in full below, details Mr Palmer’s intention to launch a class action on behalf of West Australian citizens should the WA Government decide to make COVID-19 vaccination mandatory, coerce people into getting vaccinated when their normal choice would be not to do so, or in some way incentivise vaccination, thereby altering what would be their normal choice.    

The letter references a recent CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) study that showed 74% of people in the study were infected with COVID-19 despite being fully vaccinated.

The majority of those displayed symptoms, such as cough, sore throat, fever, etc, and four of those fully vaccinated people were hospitalised.  

…………………………………………………       

Dear Chief Health Officer,      

Australia’s COVID-19 Vaccination Program 

1. I act for Mr. Clive F Palmer.   

2. I enclose, for your attention, a copy of the study entitled: “Outbreak of SARS-CoV-2 Infections, Including COVID-19 Vaccine Breakthrough Infections, Associated with Large Public Gatherings — Barnstable County, Massachusetts, July 2021” (CDC Study) published 30 July 2021 by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).   

3. The CDC Study is also accessible HERE

4. I am instructed by Mr Palmer that:     

A) the CDC Study found: 

• During July 2021, 469 cases of COVID-19 associated with multiple summer events and large public gatherings in a town in Barnstable County, Massachusetts, were identified among Massachusetts residents; vaccination coverage among eligible Massachusetts residents was 69%. 

• Approximately three quarters (346; 74%) of cases occurred in fully vaccinated persons (those who had completed a 2-dose course of mRNA vaccine [Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna] or had received a single dose of Janssen [Johnson & Johnson] vaccine ≥14days before exposure). 
  
• Overall, 274 (79%) vaccinated patients with breakthrough infection were symptomatic, with the most common symptoms being cough, headache, sore throat, myalgia and fever. 

• Among five COVID-19 patients who were hospitalised, four were fully vaccinated; no deaths were reported. The four vaccinated patients who were hospitalised were aged between 20 and 70.

• Vaccine products received by persons experiencing breakthrough infections were Pfizer-BioNTech (159; 46%), Moderna (131; 38%), and Janssen (56; 16%); among fully vaccinated persons in the Massachusetts general population, 56% had received Pfizer-BioNTech, 38% had received Moderna, and 7% had received Janssen vaccine products.  

• Genomic sequencing of specimens from 133 patients identified the B.1.617.2 (Delta)variant of SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, in 119 (89%) and the DeltaAY.3 sublineage in one (1%).    

B) the function of a vaccine, properly so-called and as understood by the public, is to:   

i) stop the vaccinated person from becoming infected with a human disease caused by the relevant virus, and to provide immunity against that disease in due course;    

ii) prevent a vaccinated person from developing symptoms of the disease caused by the relevant virus;

and iii) stop transmission of the relevant disease by a vaccinated person.   

C) his view is that:

i) it is clear from the CDC Study that the COVID-19 vaccines do not successfully carry out any of these functions. The COVID-19 vaccines fail on all three criteria.   

ii) the COVID-19 vaccines have failed and are not fit to be regarded as vaccines at all.   

D) further: 

i) there is no safety data for one, three or five-year safety data for the use of these vaccines;   

ii) there is no data regarding the safety of the vaccine for children and pregnant women.   

5. Mr Palmer’s view is that:

A) the CDC Study shows statistically significant numbers of people said to be vaccinated against COVID-19 are:    i) becoming infected with COVID-19 or its variants; ii) becoming symptomatic; iii) transmitting the disease; and iv) being admitted to hospital.   

B) people are being injected with the COVID-19 vaccines, risking their health and their lives, for no good reason.   

C) as a member of the Western Australian public service, under the Public Sector Management Act 1994 (WA)¸ you are obliged to: i) act in a way that protects and promotes the interests of the WA health system; ii) make decisions based on fair and objective processes; and iii) ensure your decisions are not influenced by self-interest, considerations of personal gain or other improper motives  

D) as it stands, you continue to roll out the COVID-19 vaccines despite: 
i) a lack of data supporting the efficacy and safety of the vaccines; 
ii) clear safety issues, which are known and quantified;
and iii) data from the leading diseases peak body internationally, the CDC, which demonstrates that the vaccines, for the reasons above, are ineffective against COVID-19 and its variants and therefore do not fulfil their purpose.   

6. Mr Palmer’s position is that:   

A) you are providing the public with incomplete, incorrect and misleading information regarding the COVID-19 vaccines;   

B) you are advocating for the vaccination of the Australian public on the basis of this incomplete, incorrect and misleading information;   

C) if you or your Government cause to be implemented legislation, regulations, policies or make declarations which:
i) require or coerce individuals to be vaccinated with a COVID-19 vaccine;
and ii) incentivise vaccination with a COVID-19 vaccine, then that will cause economic loss to be caused to businesses and individuals who decide not to be vaccinated (“the Class”) and Mr Palmer intends to fund a class action seeking:   
iii) an injunction in respect of the introduction of those measures;
and iv. damages for the economic loss caused, and/or likely to be caused, to the Class;   

D) it is unconscionable for you to: 
i) perpetuate the falsehood that the COVID-19 vaccines prevent a person from becoming infected with the disease and prevent a person from infecting others;
and ii) support measures which require or coerce individuals to be vaccinated, or otherwise incentivise vaccination, and Mr Palmer may also bring an action against you personally.   

7. I look forward to receiving your response as soon as possible and, in any event, within 7 days.   

ENDS

Most Covid patients at Israeli hospital fully vaccinated? What does this mean for Australia?

Outbreak of SARS-CoV-2 Infections, Including COVID-19 Vaccine Breakthrough Infections, Associated with Large Public Gatherings — Barnstable County, Massachusetts, July 2021

Independent Lab Tests Reveal At Least 62% of mRNA Vaccine Recipients Are Experiencing Capillary Clotting: Canada

Ex-Pfizer VP Yeadon Warns: Children 50 Times More Likely to Die From Vaccine Than Virus

The post Clive Palmer letter to WA Premier & CHO appeared first on The Truth About Covid Vaccines.

Israel has been held up as the “gold standard” of how to conduct the coronavirus vaccine rollout. It has seen approximately 70% of its population receive the jab. The Israelis have relied in the main on the Pfizer vaccine. 

However, recently the country’s Prime Minister, Naftali Bennett, stated that the Pfizer vaccine is ‘significantly less’ effective against the so-called Delta variant. This follows on from a statement last June by Ran Balicer, who leads an expert advisory panel for the Israeli government, in announcing that the country might end up in lockdown again. Balicer and other officials said that 90 per cent of the new cases were caused by the Delta variant.  

Now an Israeli doctor has revealed a bombshell during a television interview. In the interview on August 5 with Israel’s Chanel 13, Dr Kobi Haviv, medical director of Herzog Hospital in Jerusalem, stated that the majority of coronavirus patients in an Israeli hospital are fully vaccinated, including those with severe disease.  

Dr Haviv further specified that: “95% of the severe patients are vaccinated,” adding “85-90% of the hospitalizations are in fully vaccinated people” and the hospital is “opening more and more COVID wards.” This has led him to conclude that “the effectiveness of the vaccine is fading out.” 

Of the 72 hospitalized COVID-19 patients, 25 patients were in “critical condition”, 38 were in “moderate” condition, and 9 were in “mild” condition. There were two deaths reported at the time of the interview. 

Data from the Israeli Minister of Health released on July 22 declared that the effectiveness of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine at preventing COVID-19 has plummeted from 90 percent to only 39 percent, coinciding with the spread of the Delta variant in the country. 

All this begs a significant question as far as Australia is concerned. After National Cabinet on July 30, Prime Minister Scott Morrison announced that there will be “special rules” for people who are vaccinated because they present “less of a public health risk” However, in light of the above, why are our politicians and health officials insisting on this rhetoric, and that vaccinations are the way out of these ‘Delta’ induced lockdowns, when evidence is mounting to the contrary?  

A Covid-19 outbreak in a Massachusetts county in July primarily occurred among vaccinated people, sparking fears that a variant of the virus can impact that population more than other strains. 

Of the 469 cases detected in Barnstable County, 74 percent occurred among the fully vaccinated, according to a new study published by the CDC on 30 July. It also emerged last month that 49 fully vaccinated people in New Jersey died of coronavirus.   

Across the Atlantic, early analysis from Public Health England suggests vaccinated people infected with the Delta variant may be as infectious as their unvaccinated counterparts. The PHE technical briefing indicates that that “whilst vaccination may reduce an individual’s overall risk of becoming infected, once they are infected there is limited difference in viral load between those who are vaccinated and unvaccinated.” 

What is even more concerning is that, as alerted to by the Doctors for Covid Ethics, a Freedom of Information request to the Australian drugs regulator, the Therapeutic Goods Administration that granted provisional approval to the Pfizer vaccine, confirms that it has never seen the study data.

In other words, the TGA never saw or requested the patient data from Pfizer and simply accepted their reporting of their study as true.This means that when the head of the TGA John Skerritt said that “the safety evidence is pretty thorough” on February 6, his words would ring hollow to most Australians who have assumed, rightly or wrongly, that the TGA had actually looked at the patient data before granting any such approval. As noted by Doctors for Covid Ethics on its website, it is currently not known whether any of the major government agencies around the globe (FDA, MHRA or EMA) has independently verified, or attempted to verify, Pfizer’s data, before proceeding with provisional/emergency authorisation of Pfizer’s mRNA therapy vaccine. 

For any government, either by itself or via corporate proxy, to attempt to mandate vaccines in circumstances where there has not been adequate testing and analysis of risks as well as benefits would constitute not only a violation of the principle of informed consent (which Prime Minister Scott Morrison has stated he believes in – see this press conference as an example) — but a violation of Australia’s obligations under international law with respect to medical experimentation. 

Indeed, after National Cabinet on August 6, Scott Morrison indicated that mandatory vaccination could breach privacy laws, discrimination laws, and Australia’s policy remained that vaccines should be voluntary and free. In particular, he declared: “In our country, everyone has choices and they have choices that are supported by the rule of law and simply making the point that those choices have to be exercised, are consistent with the rule of law.” 

Let’s just see if these will simply be more hollow words from the hollow man.

Outbreak of SARS-CoV-2 Infections, Including COVID-19 Vaccine Breakthrough Infections, Associated with Large Public Gatherings — Barnstable County, Massachusetts, July 2021

Independent Lab Tests Reveal At Least 62% of mRNA Vaccine Recipients Are Experiencing Capillary Clotting: Canada

The Spike Protein is the Reason Why the Vaccines Might Kill You

Ex-Pfizer VP Yeadon Warns: Children 50 Times More Likely to Die From Vaccine Than Virus

The post Most Covid patients at Israeli hospital fully vaccinated? What does this mean for Australia? appeared first on The Truth About Covid Vaccines.

[This post contains video, click to play]

Over the weekend, tens of thousands rallied in Sydney to protest the ongoing and escalating NSW lockdown.

And like clockwork, the media demonised and vilified all who attended the Freedom Day March by focusing on a tiny minority misbehaving.

But we knew that was going to happen, so Rebel News sent a camera crew to bring you the other side of the story.

Watch and share what our camera crew captured, including the heartbreaking pleas from everyday Aussies of all backgrounds.

The post Powerful Sydney Freedom Day PROTEST VIDEO appeared first on The Truth About Covid Vaccines.

Trust the Scientists

How many times have you heard the phrase ‘Trust the Scientists’ but never seen anyone’s name mentioned. Below are several doctors and scientists that warn against the vaccines.

Dr. Robert Malone – Inventor of mRNA Technology – in June, 2021 made a 3 hour video in which he says in great detail why the Covid vaccine is so dangerous.

Dr. Micheal Yeadon – Worked for Pfizer for 16+ years reaching the position of Vice President – says these vaccines are dangerous.

Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche – Worked in the vaccine industry his entire career – says injecting millions of people during an ongoing pandemic is dangerous.

Professor Dolores Cahill – from University College Dublin School of Medicine – Expects those that get injected to start dying or get very sick within the next few years.

More Doctors that have spoken up about the dangers of the vaccines that you can look up:
Dr. Roger Hodkinson
Dr. Byram Brindle
Dr. Peter McCullough
Dr. Zev Zelenko
Dr. Carrie Madej
Dr Sherri Tenpenny
Dr. Stephanie Seneff
Dr. Lee Merritt
Dr. Vernon Coleman
Professor Sucharit Bhakdi

Related: 
Australian Covid Vaccine Data
If You Get Sick, You’re Stuffed
No Vaccine Data for Pregnancy
Thrombosis Out of the Blue
Thousands of Adverse Reactions
Vaccine Manufacturers Indemnified
Don’t Tell the Public
Texas Senate Committee Throws Out Mandatory COVID Vaccination
Professor Dolores Cahill Discusses Covid Vaccination Effects
Canada: Moderna Vaccine Wrecks Havoc on Lytton BC

The post The Spike Protein is the Reason Why the Vaccines Might Kill You appeared first on The Truth About Covid Vaccines.

In a letter sent to Prof Skerritt today, Mr Palmer strongly defended the campaign saying all of the advertisements quoted TGA reported facts.

“The first fact being that there has only been one COVID death in Australia this year. The second fact being that your organisation, the TGA, reported that there have been over 300 deaths in Australia following the administration of the COVID vaccine,’’ Mr Palmer said.

“I’m interested to see the autopsy data which confirms that these deaths haven’t been caused by the vaccine.

“I believe it is prima facie a reasonable assumption that if people are vaccinated and then they die prima facie the vaccine may have been the cause of their deaths,’’ he said.

Mr Palmer said it was Prof Skerritt’s responsibility in his public role to ensure that those matters are properly investigated and autopsies carried out to see if this prima facie conclusion can be disregarded.

“It is a simple fact that the TGA – according to TGA reporting – has received over 24,000 adverse reports. Over 24,000 adverse reports would indicate that any public servant responsible for regulating such a medicine should exercise what power he or she has in the public interest and cease the administration and roll out of such a medicine.

“Otherwise, it could be inferred that he or she is committing a serious malfeasance in public office and will bear a personal responsibility for the outcomes,’’ he said.

Mr Palmer said the CDC website in the United States confirmed that their vaccine program had caused over 5,000 deaths, 3,900 disabilities, 571 miscarriages, 1,500 Bell’s palsy cases and 1,900 heart attacks.

“Why doesn’t the TGA publish Australian equivalent figures in these categories?

“I note Prof Skerritt’s comments in respect of the transparency however, it is disappointing that the TGA reports have now stopped reporting the number of people that have died following their COVID-19 vaccination,’’ Mr Palmer said.

“Such a number of deaths caused over such a small portion of the Australians who have had the vaccines over such a compressed period of time should be a matter of concern. Normally a medicine that was responsible for even one death would be suspended.

“I understand there have been over 10,000 deaths reported in Europe in respect of the vaccine. The combination of the forgoing matters means it’s beyond belief that the TGA does not take immediate action.

“The facts of the matter are clear on the CDC website in the United States that over 50% of animals died in the animal trials of these vaccines, which would normally indicate that such vaccines are not suitable for human consumption.

“I do not understand why the Australian Government has bought over 180,000,000 doses of the vaccines when there are less than 25,000,000 Australians.  Prima facie it looks a serious case of enrichment for pharma companies at the public’s expense,’’ Mr Palmer said.

“In respect to the 3.7 million deaths alleged to be caused by COVID in the world; you need to take stock of the number of deaths that occur in the world each year.

“I am concerned about Australia and Australians and there has only been one COVID death in Australia this year. Moreover, serious concerns need to be expressed about Doctor Fauci in the US and the revelations that have come to light in recent times.

“I know from previous dealing with the TGA that in many instances the TGA relies on his group to advise it.

“The facts are that we have no safety data for 1, 3, 5, or 7 years for these vaccines. Nor do we have data on the effects on pregnant women or children.

“The TGA has no idea of the long-term outcomes of giving this vaccine to the Australian population. It is also a great concern that the Government has given the pharmaceutical companies an indemnity for any claims related to the injuries and deaths their vaccines may cause.

“It would seem that those same pharmaceutical companies do not have faith and confidence in their products to market them as part of their business without such Government indemnity.”

Mr Palmer said he found it personally disappointing that Prof Skerritt, as head of the TGA, had a responsibility to properly regulate medicines and vaccines in this country.

“I find it extraordinary to see Prof Skerritt on television in paid commercials promoting a commercial product that is both the TGA’s and his own responsibility to regulate.

“This is a serious conflict of interest. The Hight Court of Australia has reconfirmed the implied term in our constitution of political free speech. I am a former member of the House of Representatives and a chairman of a registered political party under the electoral act.

“I will continue to exercise my constitutional rights in this matter and if necessary, I am happy to meet any challenge in court in that regard,’’ he said.

Mr Palmer has advised Prof Skerritt to obtain proper legal advice to ensure he is protected against any claims that may be made personally against him in the future.

“He needs to advise the government of what the Attorney General’s department knows already – that the Biosecurity Act is unconstitutional and could not survive a challenge in the High Court of Australia.

“History has shown that governments have often been wrong. That propaganda and coverups have often taken place. That millions have died because people in authority lack the courage and the proprietary to follow through with the principles and ethics of their calling,’’ Mr Palmer said.

“There is no pandemic in Australia – only one person has died of COVID this year. The TGA and the government has started spreading misleading information, designed to create fear in the population.

“The only information that was published by me is that there has been one COVID death this year, that the TGA have reported that over 300 people have died after receiving the vaccination and that there were over 24,000 adverse reports received by the TGA.  All of that comes from TGA releases.”

Mr Palmer said he regarded Prof Skerritt’s statements about him as defamatory and was considering them before taking legal advice.

“It seemed all of those facts and statements in our advertisements are absolutely true and confirmed by the TGA. Australians have the right to be fully informed. Informed consent is a fundamental pre-requisite for any medical treatment,’’ Mr Palmer said.

“Australia has signed international conventions guaranteeing such consent. There are serious questions to be answered over the financial and other interests of the TGA’s so-called expert committees.

“I am sure in the future that those committees will be shown not to be as independent as they should be and not to contain experts from all States and all relevant universities,” Mr Palmer said.

Related: 
Australian Covid Vaccine Data
If You Get Sick, You’re Stuffed
No Vaccine Data for Pregnancy
Thrombosis Out of the Blue
Thousands of Adverse Reactions
Vaccine Manufacturers Indemnified
Don’t Tell the Public
Texas Senate Committee Throws Out Mandatory COVID Vaccination
Professor Dolores Cahill Discusses Covid Vaccination Effects
Canada: Moderna Vaccine Wrecks Havoc on Lytton BC

The post Clive Palmer responds to TGA head, Professor Skerritt over COVID ad campaign appeared first on The Truth About Covid Vaccines.

[This post contains video, click to play]

Mr CRAIG KELLY (Hughes) (10:05): I move:

That this bill be now read a second time.

The principle behind the No Domestic COVID Vaccine Passports Bill 2021 is quite simple: COVID vaccines in this country should be freely available to all, with informed consent of course, but they should be mandatory to nobody. Already, there are 16 US states that have introduced similar legislation to that which I am introducing today. This bill has been modelled on Florida’s bill, introduced by Governor DeSantis, which has been widely accepted by the Florida electorate. I hope that this parliament will move forward and bring this bill on for debate and a vote as soon as possible. This bill is simply about the type of country that we want. Do we want a country where government officials and petty bureaucrats demand that you show your medical papers? That is not the country that I want. Your medical records should be something between you and your doctor.

The entire concept of a vaccine passport is itself inherently misleading. There is little evidence to show that these novel experimental COVID genetic vaccines actually prevent someone from contracting COVID or prevent someone from spreading COVID or prevent someone from being hospitalised with COVID. For the education of the member at the desk, I have the latest data from the US on what they call ‘vaccine breakthrough cases’. These are cases where someone has been injected twice and, after a period of 14 days, still contracts COVID. The number is so many that they no longer count them, but they do count the number of hospitalisations. As at 14 June, the number of so-called breakthrough cases—that is, people who have been vaccinated twice and have ended up in hospital with COVID—stands at 2,622, and the number of deaths of people who have been vaccinated twice in the US and have passed away from COVID stands at 549. However, these numbers, the CDC says, are ‘likely a substantial undercount’ of all SARS infections among so-called fully vaccinated persons, and this surveillance relies upon ‘passive and voluntary reporting’. So we don’t actually know what the true number of breakthrough cases are.

There is also growing concern over vaccine safety. The highly respected and highly credentialed Dr Tess Lawrie recently stated in submission she made that, ‘There is more than enough evidence to declare that the COVID vaccines are unsafe for use in humans.’ This is also a great concern, as we also have data from VAERS in the USA that shows that, as at 4 June, there have been 5,888 deaths that have occurred in people after the vaccine. Now it is true that this VAERS data is questionable. Dr Peter McCullough suggested that the number is more like 50,000 rather than 5,888. But the fact is that we just do not know. Again, this VAERS data is based on voluntary reporting. So we simply have no idea about what the true rate of deaths are after COVID injections and we have no idea whether they were related to them or just a mere coincidence.

I’d say that’s the entire problem, because we have to admit that this is still one giant medical experiment. I’d liked to quote Dr Damian Wojcik of New Zealand. Talking about having his patients injected, he said: ‘Not on my watch. Not with my patients. My patients are living persons with names and families, not laboratory rats to be sacrificed in a global experiment.’ Dr Roger Hodkinson—a doctor from Canada—said recently: ‘This experimental vaccine should never have been released. Mass vaccination is so transparently stupid; medical idiocy of a grotesque degree. The bottom line is that mass vaccination of everybody should stop immediately. And when it comes to injecting this stuff into the arms of children, I call this “state sanctioned child abuse”.’ Dr Peter McCullough has recently stated, ‘I can no longer recommend the vaccines’.

Therefore, as this is a medical experiment, the idea of having a vaccine passport is coercive. It is to coerce people into participating in a medical experiment, of which we simply do not know what the end result will be. We’ve even seen here in Australia how our medical bureaucrats have got it wrong time and time again. Firstly, when it came to the AstraZeneca vaccine, they said that there was no evidence of a relationship with blood clots. They were dangerously wrong. Then it was clear from the data out of Europe, from the European Medicines Agency, that the AstraZeneca should be suspended and most European countries elected for a cut-off date of 60 years of age. So, if you were under 60, in most European countries they did not give you the AstraZeneca vaccine.

But our medical bureaucrats decided that the Europeans didn’t know what they were doing and that we would have the cut-off at 50. Only last week they admitted that they were wrong again, and the result of their error has been that 800,000 Australians have been injected with a substance which our Chief Medical Officer now says has a greater risk than any benefit. This was 800,000 Australians injected, where the risk was greater to them than any benefit because of a mistake by our medical bureaucrats.

The thing is that we should look at that risk-benefit analysis. But we’ve seen that the short-term risks have been grossly underestimated by health officials around the world. That’s why there have been suspensions and recalls. But we have no idea of the medium-term risks, we have no idea of the long-term risks and we have no idea of the intergenerational risks. Therefore, for anyone to stand up and say that they know that the benefits outweigh the risks, well, they simply cannot say that. If you cannot quantify medium-, long-term and intergenerational risks then you simply cannot make that assessment—the data is not there. We’re flying blind into this experiment.

That’s also why we do not need a domestic vaccine passport in this country. It would also be a complete violation of human rights. The UN Economic and Social Council has said, ‘The right to health contains freedoms such as “the right to control one’s health and body, including sexual and reproductive freedom, and the right to be free from interference, such as the right to be free from torture, non-consensual medical treatment and experimentation.’

I’d also like to make special mention of our Paralympic squad. We have bureaucrats there running that Paralympic squad that have decided to discriminate against Paralympians. So we have a situation where athletes are playing the same sport, going to the same country, going to the same city, going to the same Olympic facilities and playing at the same stadiums. If they are a Paralympian they are forced into this experiment—otherwise they are not picked. If they are in the normal Olympics, that does not apply. That is discrimination. That is contrary to the principles of this bill. I would call on Paralympic Australia to end their discrimination against athletes going to the Paralympics. With that, I commend this bill to the House, and I also congratulate my good friend the member for Dawson on being the seconder for this bill.

The SPEAKER: Is the motion seconded?

Mr Christensen: Seconded.

Debate adjourned.

CRAIG KELLY – Bill to Parliament: No Requirement for Medical Treatment (Including Experimental Injections) Without Consent

Data from Israel shows very high number of COVID-19 cases in double jabbed. Vaccines not stopping transmission.

Worse Than the Disease? Reviewing Some Possible Unintended Consequences of the mRNA Vaccines Against COVID-19

Most Covid patients at Israeli hospital fully vaccinated? What does this mean for Australia?

The post CRAIG KELLY – Bill to Parliament: No Domestic COVID Vaccine Passports Bill 2021 appeared first on The Truth About Covid Vaccines.

Men and Women of Australia,
I feel duty-bound to bring the following to your attention.
The Australian Government’s Therapeutic Goods Administration report confirms 210 deaths and 24,000 adverse reactions after the COVID-19 vaccines. There are over 5,000 deaths in the USA attributed to the Covid Vaccines including Pfizer.
While I support the use of vaccines that have approval for general use, I am very concerned by the use of this vaccine on the general population.
My understanding is that emergency use of a medicine is only authorised in the US if the person receiving the treatment is in immediate danger of dying. This is not the case with millions of Australians who are not ill. The simple fact is that we don’t have one-year safety data, three-year safety data, or five-year safety data for the use of the COVID-19 vaccine on humans or animals. Over 50% of animals in the animal trials have died.
I do not understand why it is that millions of Australians should be subject to a medical treatment that has not complied with normal practices.
There is no pandemic in Australia – only one person has died of COVID in 2021. The TGA and the government have spread misleading information designed to create fear in the population. TheCenter for Disease Control website in the United States confirms the following effects that their vaccine program has had using the same vaccines that the TGA has approved in Australia – over5,000 deaths, 3,900 disabled, 571 miscarriages, 1,500 Bell’s Palsy, and 1,900 heart attacks.
The Governments around Australia have done a great job in protecting all Australians from COVID-19 and for healthy Australians to receive such a treatment is, as I understand it, unprecedented.
I don’t understand why Australians need to rush or take risks with their lives.
And I don’t understand why the Australian Government has granted the pharmaceutical companies a complete indemnity should their COVID-19 vaccines cause illness or death. It would appear that these pharmaceutical companies lack confidence in their own products, which makes them ask for such an indemnity. No one will be successful in court if the government has indemnified the pharmaceutical companies.
We need to maintain the very high standards Australia has set for itself in the approvals of vaccines.
The COVID 19 Vaccine doesn’t stop you from getting COVID and it doesn’t stop you from passing it on. Does it serve any real purpose?

For the TGA report and more information go to: thetruthaboutcovidvaccines.com

God bless Australia, Clive Palmer

New TGA Safety update – Now 24,402 adverse reactions.

Death data REMOVED
Guillain-Barre syndrome added as an adverse event of interest.

Adverse events of special interest that we are monitoring for both vaccines include:

• clotting disorders without thrombocytopenia (low platelets) including stroke, pulmonary embolism, and deep vein thrombosis
• anaphylaxis
• thrombocytopenia without thrombosis
• seizures
• acute cardiac injury, for example myocarditis and pericarditis, heart failure and cardiogenic shock, arrhythmia
• facial weakness or paralysis, for example Bell’s palsy
• loss of sense of taste or smell (also called ageusia or anosmia)
• Guillain-Barre syndrome.

Related: Australian Covid Vaccine Data

If You Get Sick, You’re Stuffed

No Vaccine Data for Pregnancy

Thrombosis Out of the Blue

Thousands of Adverse Reactions

Vaccine Manufacturers Indemnified

Don’t Tell the Public

Texas Senate Committee Throws Out Mandatory COVID Vaccination

Professor Dolores Cahill Discusses Covid Vaccination Effects

Canada: Moderna Vaccine Wrecks Havoc on Lytton BC

The post A Message from Clive Palmer appeared first on The Truth About Covid Vaccines.

[This post contains video, click to play]

Related: Texas Senate Committee Throws Out Mandatory COVID Vaccination

Professor Dolores Cahill Discusses Covid Vaccination Effects

Canada: Moderna Vaccine Wrecks Havoc on Lytton BC

If You Get Sick, You’re Stuffed

No Vaccine Data for Pregnancy

Thrombosis Out of the Blue

Thousands of Adverse Reactions

Vaccine Manufacturers Indemnified

Don’t Tell the Public

The post Australian Covid Vaccine Data appeared first on The Truth About Covid Vaccines.

[This post contains video, click to play]

Sixth of 6 revealing moments with information about the Covid-19 vaccines, as discussed in the Australian Federal Senate hearing of April 21, 2021.

John Skerritt: The safety… the efficacy of the vaccine wasn’t assessed during clinical trials in pregnant women.

Brendan Murphy: The Commonwealth has provided certain indemnities to the vaccine manufacturers to protect that.

Senator Jacqui Lambie: If something goes wrong, you’re stuffed. The government isn’t going to look after you and you’re not getting compensation.

Brendan Murphy: I would hope you wouldn’t say to the public that if something goes wrong, you’re stuffed, Senator, that would not be good…

Senator Jacqui Lambie (interjecting): Well that’s the truth Mr. Murphy… it takes years to get through a court system!

Related: If You Get Sick, You’re Stuffed

No Vaccine Data for Pregnancy

Thrombosis Out of the Blue

Thousands of Adverse Reactions

Vaccine Manufacturers Indemnified

The post Don’t Tell the Public appeared first on The Truth About Covid Vaccines.

[This post contains video, click to play]

Fifth of 6 revealing moments with information about the Covid-19 vaccines, as discussed in the Australian Federal Senate hearing of April 21, 2021.

John Skerritt: The safety… the efficacy of the vaccine wasn’t assessed during clinical trials in pregnant women.

Brendan Murphy: The Commonwealth has provided certain indemnities to the vaccine manufacturers to protect that.

Related: If You Get Sick, You’re Stuffed

No Vaccine Data for Pregnancy

Thrombosis Out of the Blue

Thousands of Adverse Reactions

Don’t Tell the Public

The post Vaccine Manufacturers Indemnified appeared first on The Truth About Covid Vaccines.

[This post contains video, click to play]

Fourth of 6 revealing moments with information about the Covid-19 vaccines, as discussed in the Australian Federal Senate hearing of April 21, 2021.

John Skerritt: And it has contributed to a significant increase in adverse event reports. We currently have about 11,000 adverse event reports for the two … covid vaccines in front of the TGA.

Update: Over 24,000 adverse events were reported to the TGA by the 30th May 2021.

Related: If You Get Sick, You’re Stuffed

No Vaccine Data for Pregnancy

Thrombosis Out of the Blue

Vaccine Manufacturers Indemnified

Don’t Tell the Public

The post Thousands of Adverse Reactions appeared first on The Truth About Covid Vaccines.

[This post contains video, click to play]

Third of 6 revealing moments with information about the Covid-19 vaccines, as discussed in the Australian Federal Senate hearing of April 21, 2021.

Brendan Murphy: Thrombosis, it appears out of the blue, whether you have an underlying medical condition or not.

John Skerritt: Currently we have about 11,000 adverse event reports for the two covid vaccines in front of the TGA.

Update: Over 24,000 adverse events were reported to the TGA by the 30th May 2021.

Related: If You Get Sick, You’re Stuffed

No Vaccine Data for Pregnancy

Thousands of Adverse Reactions

Vaccine Manufacturers Indemnified

Don’t Tell the Public

The post Thrombosis Out of the Blue appeared first on The Truth About Covid Vaccines.

[This post contains video, click to play]

Second of 6 revealing moments with information about the Covid-19 vaccines, as discussed in the Australian Federal Senate hearing of April 21, 2021.

John Skerritt: The specific advice from the TGA is that the safety… the efficacy of the vaccine wasn’t assessed during clinical trials in pregnant women.

Brendan Murphy: In the absence of any studies, specific studies, in pregnant women, the advice has been that at this stage, people should have a discussion with their doctor.

Senator Jacqui Lambie: If something goes wrong, you’re stuffed. The government isn’t going to look after you, and you’re not getting compensation.

Related: If You Get Sick, You’re Stuffed

Thrombosis Out of the Blue

Thousands of Adverse Reactions

Vaccine Manufacturers Indemnified

Don’t Tell the Public

The post No Vaccine Data for Pregnancy appeared first on The Truth About Covid Vaccines.

[This post contains video, click to play]

First of 6 revealing moments with information about the Covid-19 vaccines, as discussed in the Australian Federal Senate hearing of April 21, 2021.

Brendan Murphy: Early on, when this clotting, thrombosis issue was first identified, there were… people didn’t understand it, there were some suggestions that people with, er, underlying clotting tendencies should not have the vaccine. There’s no evidence that… any underlying medical conditions predispose to this… reaction, rare reaction. It appears out of the blue, whether you have an underlying medical condition or not.

John Skerritt: And there’s no er, formal… what we call contraindications – in other words, you must not have this vaccine if you have X.

Brendan Murphy: The Commonwealth has provided certain indemnities to the vaccine manufacturers to protect that.

Senator Jacqui Lambie: If something goes wrong, you’re stuffed. The government isn’t going to look after you, and you’re not getting compensation.

Brendan Murphy: I would hope you wouldn’t… say to the public that if something goes wrong, you’re stuffed, Senator, that would not be good…

Senator Jacqui Lambie: If you do get sick from this stuff, you will get sick. I’m not going to sit here and pretend that’s not happening. Or that it won’t happen.

Related: No Vaccine Data for Pregnancy

Thrombosis Out of the Blue

Thousands of Adverse Reactions

Vaccine Manufacturers Indemnified

Don’t Tell the Public

The post If You Get Sick, You’re Stuffed appeared first on The Truth About Covid Vaccines.

[This post contains video, click to play]

Related: Texas Senate Committee Throws Out Mandatory COVID Vaccination

Canada: Moderna Vaccine Wrecks Havoc on Lytton BC

If You Get Sick, You’re Stuffed

No Vaccine Data for Pregnancy

Thrombosis Out of the Blue

Thousands of Adverse Reactions

Vaccine Manufacturers Indemnified

Don’t Tell the Public

The post Professor Dolores Cahill Discusses Covid Vaccination Effects appeared first on The Truth About Covid Vaccines.